Home page
Contact us
Print this page

(?)

 Site map

 

Participant Evaluation Form

Course Title: 
Course Date
Name (Optional):  
Facilitator(s):

The aim of this evaluation is to solicit valuable information, which will be used to assist with improved planning and implementation of effective training programmes.  We invite you to fully participate in this exercise.

Course Content & Materials

Kindly respond to the following questions/statements by rating each on a scale of 1 - 5 using the following indicators:

1. Poor  2. Moderate 3. Average 4. Good  5. Excellent
1. Were the facts and principles of the course clearly highlighted?

2. Degree of difficulty of the materials used.

3. How would you rate the general content of the course?

4. The relevance of the material covered in the course to your function

5. Opportunities for discussion and exchange during the course.

6. The length of the course relevant to the objectives.

7. Are skills and knowledge learnt easily applicable?

8. How would you rate the quality of the course materials?


What suggestions do you have with regards to the improvement of the course content and materials?
 

The Course Facilitators

Facilitator's Name: 

Please rate the facilitator(s) according to the following rating:

1. Needs
Improvement		 2.
Moderate		 3.
Average		 4.
Good		 5.
Excellent
1. Organization and thoroughness of the materials used.

2. Clarity of presentation of the subject matter.

3. Clarity of instructions to participants.

4. Ability to draw on relevant examples and personal experiences.

5. Ability to stimulate and maintain the participant's interest.

6. Making of appropriate summaries

In the event that the facilitator(s) fall(s) short of your expectations, what suggestions do you have for improvement in this area?

Facilitator's Name: 

Please rate the facilitator(s) according to the following rating:

1. Needs
Improvement		 2.
Moderate		 3.
Average		 4.
Good		 5.
Excellent
1. Organization and thoroughness of the materials used.

2. Clarity of presentation of the subject matter.

3. Clarity of instructions to participants.

4. Ability to draw on relevant examples and personal experiences.

5. Ability to stimulate and maintain the participant's interest.

6. Making of appropriate summaries

In the event that the facilitator(s) fall(s) short of your expectations, what suggestions do you have for improvement in this area?

Facilitator's Name: 

Please rate the facilitator(s) according to the following rating:

1. Needs
Improvement		 2.
Moderate		 3.
Average		 4.
Good		 5.
Excellent
1. Organization and thoroughness of the materials used.

2. Clarity of presentation of the subject matter.

3. Clarity of instructions to participants.

4. Ability to draw on relevant examples and personal experiences.

5. Ability to stimulate and maintain the participant's interest.

6. Making of appropriate summaries

In the event that the facilitator(s) fall(s) short of your expectations, what suggestions do you have for improvement in this area?

Facilitator's Name: 

Please rate the facilitator(s) according to the following rating:

1. Needs
Improvement		 2.
Moderate		 3.
Average		 4.
Good		 5.
Excellent
1. Organization and thoroughness of the materials used.

2. Clarity of presentation of the subject matter.

3. Clarity of instructions to participants.

4. Ability to draw on relevant examples and personal experiences.

5. Ability to stimulate and maintain the participant's interest.

6. Making of appropriate summaries

In the event that the facilitator(s) fall(s) short of your expectations, what suggestions do you have for improvement in this area?

Facilitator's Name: 

Please rate the facilitator(s) according to the following rating:

1. Needs
Improvement		 2.
Moderate		 3.
Average		 4.
Good		 5.
Excellent
1. Organization and thoroughness of the materials used.

2. Clarity of presentation of the subject matter.

3. Clarity of instructions to participants.

4. Ability to draw on relevant examples and personal experiences.

5. Ability to stimulate and maintain the participant's interest.

6. Making of appropriate summaries

In the event that the facilitator(s) fall(s) short of your expectations, what suggestions do you have for improvement in this area?

General Comments/Suggestions

1. Poor 2. Moderate 3. Average 4. Good 5. Excellent
1. The overall administration of the programme.

2. What is your overall reaction to the programme?

3. Has there been 'new' knowledge as a result of this exercise?

4. How would you rate your knowledge/skills before the programme.

5. How would you rate your knowledge/skills after the programme?

6. Were you comfortable during the training session?


Any other comments you would like to share?

Thank you for your participation!

 

 

Site last updated November 09, 2006
Copyright 2001 Barbados Co-operative & Credit Union League Ltd
All rights reserved.
Website by Future Shock